what about tamron 18200? its only 900+ if not mistaken
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V26!, The Orange Legion
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V26!, The Orange Legion
|
|
May 25 2009, 03:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
what about tamron 18200? its only 900+ if not mistaken
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 25 2009, 03:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
because the built is better and it has 2 dials HEHEHE
|
|
|
May 25 2009, 03:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
QUOTE(shootkk @ May 25 2009, 03:53 PM) Another thing that I feel the A200 is lacking is the size of the internal memory buffer. You will know if you have ever tried scrolling through shots in your CF card with the A200. The A100 scrolls much faster! You keep the button depressed and the images streaks past. On the A200 they merely scroll past. BINGO!!!!! |
|
|
May 25 2009, 05:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
|
|
|
May 25 2009, 07:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
|
|
|
May 26 2009, 07:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
QUOTE(ieR @ May 26 2009, 03:41 AM) do anyone agree with me, no matter what zoom lens, usually you gonna use only 2 zoom spot, widest and the further tele (18mm or 250mm only) (or 18mm and 70mm for kitlens) it is soo rare for anyone to use in between i realized that most of my pic were shot between 20mm~35mm on my sigma 17-70mm during my time in HK and bangkok..... Added on May 26, 2009, 3:45 amcome to think of it. it's not how good is 18-250... but rather, the choice between 18-70 or 18-250 as replacement... if u really need 70-250mm range, then go for it! i just find 70mm is sufficient. This post has been edited by Sp00kY: May 26 2009, 07:18 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 26 2009, 08:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
i have used sigma 1770 and tamron 1750, somehow i find sigma's sharper
|
|
|
May 26 2009, 08:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
hehe..true true....sigma is indeed sharp but its color is abit dull to my liking..however this can be solved in PP:)
anyone going to sepang this weekend? Added on May 26, 2009, 8:25 amanyone knows which shop is selling tamrac bags? This post has been edited by Sp00kY: May 26 2009, 08:25 AM |
|
|
May 26 2009, 12:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
I`m confused in this:
shutter speed 1/4000 - 1/2000 - 1/1000 - 1/500 - 1/250 total 4 stops? Say if i am using f/2.8 current shutter is 1/4000,what ND filter should i use to achieve 1/250? Or lower? I need a 4-stop ND filter right? so ND8? (ND 8 is 3 stops...closest adi) any web that can help this calculation? I am contemplating to get ND4/ND8 or so on. thanks This post has been edited by Sp00kY: May 26 2009, 12:59 PM |
|
|
May 26 2009, 04:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
ryzan: the colors are nice but the pic seems to be without a 'theme'
|
|
|
May 26 2009, 05:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
achew: 1680 sharp as always
|
|
|
May 26 2009, 05:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
achew:ur PP skill (makes me jealous)
|
|
|
May 26 2009, 05:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 26 2009, 05:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
|
|
|
May 26 2009, 06:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
from zoo one haha...in the office la
okok will do once i reach home..but sure kalah one:hahaha |
|
|
May 26 2009, 07:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
wonka: 2nd pic seems over-saturated..
eh the rest went HP shooting? |
|
|
May 26 2009, 08:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
|
|
|
May 26 2009, 08:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
ya man...i understand it...i cant crop it...it will be super tight which will spoil the composition...HM.....sg zoo is quite nice (in my memory la,....12 yrs ago)
|
|
|
May 26 2009, 08:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
come show ur shot!
its not kangaroo...the sign reads: flying fox (blur case)...yeah it looked STRESSED! |
|
|
May 26 2009, 09:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
!@!*(@&!@& look at that awesome pic!
Added on May 26, 2009, 9:30 pmHow to 'cut' the object out and paste a background to the back?what is the function called in photoshop? This post has been edited by Sp00kY: May 26 2009, 09:30 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0180sec
0.23
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 10:40 AM |