QUOTE(panasonic88 @ May 9 2009, 01:30 AM)
p/s: how come nobody raise up this kind of suggestion on last year (when market dropped kaw kaw)

Last year, remisers suggested to close the market around 4pm, so that can go home earlier, or can do part time job.
QUOTE(panasonic88 @ May 9 2009, 02:00 AM)
i heard from news that bursa is going to campur rojak main board and second board under one group. effective august 2009. hhmmm.
stress stress stress!

Rojak bourses, rojak investors coming.
Mesdaq changes name to ACE.
White board, black board, no board also no different lah, just name calling only. If a company is poor or a sector is not good, changing name, merged or split, make no different. It is the quality of the listed company make the different and corporate governed and sincere company management that looking after shareholders matter the most that dictate how well and healhty of the stock market.
Changing packaging, not changing the content, still the same.
The idea of 24 hours or even extended trading hour is absurb. No offence.
Remember stock market is not a direct productive product, the longer it trades or the more people speculate in the market, it doesn't contribute to economy productivity at all.
It is just a platform of investment and capital raising market. Mild speculation will bring life to the market, overly or excessive speculation will only do the damage to the economy.
Also if you can't make money in 6 hours time, then make it 24 hours got any different meh?
or you can make good profit in 6 hours, make it 24 hours will make you more gain?
No offence.

Added on May 9, 2009, 3:04 pmJust to add, a sign of overheating when more people think of extending the trading hour.
This post has been edited by cherroy: May 9 2009, 03:04 PM