Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 TMNET & MCMC Top Guy Discussion Session, Finally TMNET agree to hold a discussion

views
     
dr2k3
post Jun 26 2009, 03:38 PM

Speculator
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Bermuda Triangle
QUOTE(mylinear @ Jun 26 2009, 03:21 PM)
Name, phone no, email address, user id is already personal information. Of course you would not ask for passsword, nobody will (or should) fill in the form if so. But a username is already half the equation of login details.
Users must call the center or email them to get an report no. That is the first step. No report, no further complaints will be entertained properly.

Since a Streamyx report no should be provided, a user needs to make a report to TM first to get it. Otherwise it is pointless to send a complaint to MCMC. So the form should not be a substitute for making a report to TM. TM also has their own procedure to take the report after asking for info from the user etc. That will not happen properly with this form.

Again, I am sorry to say this but you are not the representative for users. Unless you have some direct connection and have some sort of guarantee that user problems can be solved if they submit it to you, this will give false impression to users. Unless TM and MCMC has selected you to be a liason for users, I don't see why anything different can happen than users reporting directly to TM and MCMC.
As I said, your idea of the form may be a good one, but it has to be run by TM or MCMC or a proper consumer group or a official user group to have a proper effect. Not by an individual / company / 3rd party with no authority to do so.

Again, IMO:

1. No 3rd party should have any user info.

2. Even if it is a easy way to report, it should not be done on a 3rd party website. Users have no idea what the info is being used for, even if you don't have a copy, you cannot prove that since the form is on your website and you can do what you want in the background. I am not saying you are, just that you are not authrorized to collect such info. Yes, in the end it is up to the user, but still I don't think it is right.

3. Suggest MCMC has such a form on their website, not yours.

4. In post #343, hhbks  posted about another user wanting to start a user group and that you should get in touch with that person to see what can be done. There really should be an official user group if this is to be done properly.

I really hope others will post their opinions. Most of the time people don't like to disagree on the forums as they think they become unpopular. But I think we should all listen and respect each others opinions even if they differ.

I'm sure we are all waiting to read your results from the meeting.
*
MCMC already have something similar to this form i think......
https://aduan.skmm.gov.my/eaduan_c/edaftar....FTOKEN=47678034

he/she don't need to input the mobile phone number or login ID, just the report number if they feel the privacy is a problem

well, like webdesignempire say....its something for him to gather all the info necessary for easier negotiation with MCMC or whoever.....u can say webdesignempire is like MP for all screamyx user, he need atleast something to nego with

if the form like u say to be on TM site or MCMC site we would be back to square one.....nothing will change so far im concern.....tm also have somethinng similar.........

we want changes!

just change the form abit would do

This post has been edited by dr2k3: Jun 26 2009, 03:51 PM
dr2k3
post Jul 26 2009, 12:22 PM

Speculator
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Bermuda Triangle
QUOTE(zaiham @ Jul 23 2009, 10:20 PM)
For example if copper cable got vandalised or been stolen they can easily joint it back no worries for replace the whole cable from A to B. Fiber need to replace the whole link for better data transfer, but they also can do just put a splicing process at the place were cutoff but it will effect the latency issue.
*
lol~ why is it copper being joint back no latency issue while fiber optic joint back got latency issue

i think even the whole copper being change vs fiber optic splicing, fiber optic still win

This post has been edited by dr2k3: Jul 26 2009, 12:24 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0300sec    0.43    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 09:26 AM