Iianm, I just disabled C&Q then set ACC to auto. It should under 2nd tab inside bios. Cpu configuration.

I can't get pass 249HTT....can POST if i put 250...

Owh well...nevermind as I'm more favorable towards tighter timings....which usually results on a lower HTT/Ram speed value...




At the time of typing, I'm doing another burning session as I replaced the thermal paste from stock to CM Nano Fusion...Max Temp for 1.3v now at 60c even after full load more than 2 Hours...before this I get around >60c...

Ram timings also was tighten up, Voltage lowered to 2.0v and HTT was put at 225....Vcore 1.3v HT/NB 1.2v

ok..thanks..
and at the oc tab, have part for cpu configuration..what will that b? below the ht clock i guess...
have configuration1,2,3~~n.

Try set to Configuration 1...
I never manage to try all of it. Only tried Config 1.

Ya lor, come to think of it, i didn't once touch that....what is that for actually

keep it up..try with higher priority bro...and lessen the time u use to burn ur cpu...huhuh (cdlim taught me)
i always want the max coreclock i can obtain.ram 2nd.. mind telling me what mobo u using?
i cant do anythg well now...thinking of my pity comp at home

---

Added on May 7, 2009, 3:34 pmu just try and error or u know what that thing is bro/sis? huhuh..will follow u up.config 1 ya...

i try config 1 -5, u try the others...how?
huhuuhuh
tell me if u know waht that thing afterwards ya...

This post has been edited by kuntawakaw: May 7 2009, 03:34 PM

More info on those configurations

http://www.overclock.net/amd-cpus/499786-c...-128m-help.html

I'm currently at the stage of learning my ram and mobo max settings...I always save the CPU max clock for last....because the most important is the ram and mobo...If they proved to be reliable and strong, then a low overclock CPU will be easily define as hitting the wall of it...

My mobo is TA790 128M...Rams is KHX 2GB DDR800....heatsinks stock!!!


Thanks a zillion...but after looking at it, it mentions "correspond to settings of certain preset internal CPU parameters.... which differ depending on which one is selected."... How would i know which is which for my CPU...

250htt on 7750BE should be doable with some tweaks, d higher prime stable i managed was 267HT w/ moderate ram freq, i believe thre'll be better mileage if lower ram divider is in use. most agena can't really do htt > 300 unless it's a gem.

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=Atta...=post&id=879095

btw, nice volt w/ that kinda timin & freq...

max mobo is the same if same model?? if yes..u tell me after u have ur result...
huhuhu..malas sket la

Sorry to say,it doesn't make sense at all.
Overclocking by changing multiplier only brings least burden to your board & ram and it should be much stable method.
You can even do very good oc with chaplang mobo & ram.
In the other way, oc with increasing HTT involves your board and ram. You think things will become easier when more complicated stuffs added in?
In my case, it's either insufficient vcore or overheated. Will figure it out tonight.
No offense, just to point out the right fact.

This post has been edited by dblooi: May 7 2009, 04:10 PM

dblooi is right. Of all the overclocking I've done, the multiplier doesn't give stability issues or in short, it shouldn't be the determining factor for instability. In fact, it's easier to have a high multi with low FSB combination.

Btw, I read about the new Phenom hitting 4Ghz. Is it easy to achieve?

2 master edy spoken out.....ah-khoo u should try other mobo like asus , gigabyte or msi...dont just always say DFI ~~~DFI~~~DFI only

no offense taken bro, i mentioned it becoz i encountered d scenario myself. d lower multis i'm referrin to are not low multis like 10 - 14 which require one to do high htt like 250 or 300. for eg, on 7750BE, i can't hit 3.3GHz w/ 16.5 * 200htt, d setup was bootable but very unstable regardless d temp (< 60'c)/volt (<1.6v). but w/ "lower multi (that i mean)", i was able to do prime stable @ 3.3GHz w/ 15 * 220htt. any multi > 16 was as gud as nothing to me back then when i still own d chip. w/ lite htt oc like 220 things are not that complicated at all.

i've seen some heavy oc done in xs that involve mix of "lower multi (that i mean)" & lite htt oc. so w/ my own experience backed by some examples that i read i took d risk to make suggestions to some of d guys here.

but as we all knew, oc mileage for everyone is diff, even w/ same piece of hardwares one mite not get d exact result as others.

cheers

i dun have d luxury of tryin a$u$ board bro, financially not allowed coz i'm not single & w/ limited income, i need to think of some other things while keepin myself happy (obviously gud hardwares). i'm nowhere near bro dblooi & bro clawhammer (otai since k7 era), i'm just voicin out my suggestions as an user only...

of all those that i manage to try were abit ax78, biostar 790gx a2+ & d loan unit in 790gx3. dfi was d furthest that my wallet can afford, no regret thou d board is no longer w/ me now.

This post has been edited by ah_khoo: May 7 2009, 05:04 PM

DFI

-pWs-

4GHz achievable ( check my previous post) however not stable yet,
Will try again tonight, let's see whether it's good for daily usage @ 4GHz.

i also manage to hit 4ghz but damn not easy for me... and its not even stable... waiting for the stable one from dblooi....

No worries bro ah_khoo We're all learning together and next time it's your turn to teach me how to overclock a Phenom. I've lost track totally about AMD's.

dblooi, you've used both Intel and AMD so do you think the current Phenom is faster? Worth to jump camp?

I prefer HTT combination with multi.. not only multi
shave voltage is my game ..

Intel.
Dun flame me guys.

-pWs-