hi marion
Single's Club V170, No more 69 wor.... =(
Single's Club V170, No more 69 wor.... =(
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
938 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: where I belong to.... |
hi marion
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:15 PM
|
|
VIP
3,028 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah |
QUOTE(Maxd38 @ Apr 21 2009, 03:56 PM) Will not happen, since GLC = bailout QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Apr 21 2009, 04:00 PM) Besides,even after donkey years of making cars,both Proton and Perodua havent even improved much at all,technologically.Serious design flaws like Gen 2 back view windshield or QA problems are still present.Honda,Toyota,BMW etc are making hybrids,hydrogen fuel cells or electric cars,while Proton doesnt even have a diesel engine.Campro is not even good at all,from what i heard.Low torque.Crap gearbox that broke down easily.Then,how about Lexus,which only existed for about 10 years.They are making good and powerful cars now.It's true that they have aid from Toyota,but there isnt much difference from Mitsubishi giving aid to Proton back in the 90s.Some thing is wrong with the people who are running Proton and Perodua. Lexus is effectively a Toyota subsidiary (full), different than the framework of a J-V between Perodua with Daihatsu and also, Mitsubishi with Proton...The reason for Toyota, Honda and Nissan to setup luxury marques for US, is because luxury car market = high margin and as the cost of production goes up, it makes sense to compete in higher end market, economically speaking... One thing is, i would like to see parity between Mareshian car and foreign car exists, in that way, competition is a fair game to determine who should exist... For now, i can be very sure that even without Proton, Perodua, Naza and Inokom......the tax will remains, because it is one of highest grossing tax for the government... If Proton dead in 1980's, maybe we can hope for low tax environment, but for now, realistically, it won't happen About diesel engine, there are many factors why Perodua and Proton did not offer one... Firstly, diesel quality in Malaysia is terrible even compared to Thailand, it is higher in sulphur content, and that is not suitable for modern diesel engines Second, until recently, Malaysian road tax structure is not favourable for diesel cars, until recent realignment of diesel roadtax with petrol roadtax, even with Green Engine status (introduced in 1990's), the roadtax for diesel in west Malaysia (contributed bulk of car sales in Malaysia), is about twice of the equivalent sized petrol engine car road tax...only in Sabah and Sarawak, diesel cars are common Third, naturally speaking, lack of demand means it is not viable in economics of scale Proton did have one diesel model in 1990's, the Wira diesel, unfortunately, it is not refined and clunky, as a result it is a big sales flop... If you want to see diesel cars prevalent in Mareshia, the first thing that the government should do is to increase diesel quality... Of course, the only onus of that is higher refining cost, that means higher pump price for low sulphur diesel.. Still, i advocate diesel cars than petrols... It is simply better than petrol This post has been edited by Kampung2005: Apr 21 2009, 04:18 PM |
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:15 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
79 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: 词穷 |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:17 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
70 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In a fairytale |
Alright, Marion gotta go for a bit. Be back later tonight.
Happy spammin' everyone~ *hugs for CheeChee, AbgKen, Tiggy and Maxie~~ |
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:17 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
167 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
938 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: where I belong to.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:18 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
79 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: 词穷 |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,852 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
QUOTE(MauveMarionette @ Apr 21 2009, 04:12 PM) Malaysia's technology and financial is not sufficient enough to be the main car exporter, for goodness sake even with the advance technology from other countries, we're not improving. It's more like the mentality,than financial,IMO.Our money is always been putting on the wrong place/pocket.So all I'm arguing on is the purpose of economy. For the car quality itself, I don't want to meddle. We could be main car exporter,if we dont have Proton.Various car companies wants to set up plants in South East Asia,as Malaysia is politically stable and abundance of labour.Instead,they go Thailand or else where. |
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:20 PM
|
|
VIP
3,028 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:20 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
79 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: 词穷 |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
938 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: where I belong to.... |
QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Apr 21 2009, 04:19 PM) It's more like the mentality,than financial,IMO.Our money is always been putting on the wrong place/pocket. i think malaysia disagree them to set up factory in malaysia to protect proton We could be main car exporter,if we dont have Proton.Various car companies wants to set up plants in South East Asia,as Malaysia is politically stable and abundance of labour.Instead,they go Thailand or else where. Added on April 21, 2009, 4:21 pm QUOTE(Maxd38 @ Apr 21 2009, 04:20 PM) after N still got meh?This post has been edited by thken: Apr 21 2009, 04:21 PM |
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:22 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
167 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:22 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
79 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: 词穷 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:22 PM
|
|
VIP
3,028 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah |
QUOTE(thken @ Apr 21 2009, 04:21 PM) i think malaysia disagree them to set up factory in malaysia to protect proton Protectionist policy keeps them awayAdded on April 21, 2009, 4:21 pm after N still got meh? If there is no protectionist policies, automatically, the automotive sector in Malaysia will be just like EnE sector in Malaysia Added on April 21, 2009, 4:23 pm QUOTE(Maxd38 @ Apr 21 2009, 04:22 PM) Nope, more like protectionist policies...Remember, Malaysia did delayed AFTA implementation for automobiles from 2003 to 2005 This post has been edited by Kampung2005: Apr 21 2009, 04:23 PM |
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:25 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
79 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: 词穷 |
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Apr 21 2009, 04:20 PM) They are down in peninsular I think S n S voted BN bcoz they promise to develop the states?But not in Sabah and Sarawak Sabah and Sarawak voting patterns are different than people of peninsular, remember Added on April 21, 2009, 4:26 pm QUOTE(thken @ Apr 21 2009, 04:21 PM) I'm not sure, i thought going to repeat..like R after N... Added on April 21, 2009, 4:26 pm QUOTE(-br0k3n- @ Apr 21 2009, 04:22 PM) I wonder that day will ever come...This post has been edited by Maxd38: Apr 21 2009, 04:26 PM |
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:27 PM
|
|
VIP
3,028 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah |
QUOTE(Maxd38 @ Apr 21 2009, 04:25 PM) I think S n S voted BN bcoz they promise to develop the states? Well, the flow of information in SnS is less than peninsular...Added on April 21, 2009, 4:26 pm I'm not sure, i thought going to repeat.. like R after N... Also, most of the voters are rural voters, they care more for local issues than national issues... Thus, when the village being provided with electricity and water, then you can guess what happened... |
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:28 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
79 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: 词穷 |
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Apr 21 2009, 04:22 PM) Nope, more like protectionist policies... Oh I see, and the Remember, Malaysia did delayed AFTA implementation for automobiles from 2003 to 2005 Added on April 21, 2009, 4:28 pm QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Apr 21 2009, 04:27 PM) Well, the flow of information in SnS is less than peninsular... Hahaha, u smart ler... Also, most of the voters are rural voters, they care more for local issues than national issues... Thus, when the village being provided with electricity and water, then you can guess what happened... This post has been edited by Maxd38: Apr 21 2009, 04:28 PM |
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:31 PM
|
|
VIP
3,028 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,852 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Apr 21 2009, 04:15 PM) Will not happen, since GLC = bailout 'Lexus is effectively a Toyota subsidiary (full), different than the framework of a J-V between Perodua with Daihatsu and also, Mitsubishi with Proton... The reason for Toyota, Honda and Nissan to setup luxury marques for US, is because luxury car market = high margin and as the cost of production goes up, it makes sense to compete in higher end market, economically speaking... One thing is, i would like to see parity between Mareshian car and foreign car exists, in that way, competition is a fair game to determine who should exist... For now, i can be very sure that even without Proton, Perodua, Naza and Inokom......the tax will remains, because it is one of highest grossing tax for the government... If Proton dead in 1980's, maybe we can hope for low tax environment, but for now, realistically, it won't happen About diesel engine, there are many factors why Perodua and Proton did not offer one... Firstly, diesel quality in Malaysia is terrible even compared to Thailand, it is higher in sulphur content, and that is not suitable for modern diesel engines Second, until recently, Malaysian road tax structure is not favourable for diesel cars, until recent realignment of diesel roadtax with petrol roadtax, even with Green Engine status (introduced in 1990's), the roadtax for diesel in west Malaysia (contributed bulk of car sales in Malaysia), is about twice of the equivalent sized petrol engine car road tax...only in Sabah and Sarawak, diesel cars are common Third, naturally speaking, lack of demand means it is not viable in economics of scale Proton did have one diesel model in 1990's, the Wira diesel, unfortunately, it is not refined and clunky, as a result it is a big sales flop... If you want to see diesel cars prevalent in Mareshia, the first thing that the government should do is to increase diesel quality... Of course, the only onus of that is higher refining cost, that means higher pump price for low sulphur diesel.. Still, i advocate diesel cars than petrols... It is simply better than petrol Since when we are using our own oil? As far as i know,our high quality oil is exported out to other countries and we buy back crude petrol for our own vehicles.Someone wants to earn lots of money here. The tax issue will never go away,just that it wont be this high like a few hundred percent which is ridiculous. Diesel roadtax was expensive,but if you tend to travel a lot.You still save in a long run.Diesel engine do have a lot of problem back in the 90s,as it's noisy,shaky steering and lower performance.It's no longer the case now. There will never be an even competitions between our shit cars and oversea's cars,with this current government.Nothing will ever improve if there is no fair competition and this problem also occurs in other industry like ISP. Thank good the Mak Cik crap did not happen. QUOTE(Maxd38 @ Apr 21 2009, 04:15 PM) Better go down.QUOTE(MauveMarionette @ Apr 21 2009, 04:17 PM) Alright, Marion gotta go for a bit. Be back later tonight. Bye bye,Marion. Happy spammin' everyone~ *hugs for CheeChee, AbgKen, Tiggy and Maxie~~ *hugs |
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 04:35 PM
|
|
VIP
3,028 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah |
QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Apr 21 2009, 04:32 PM) ' I agree with that...Since when we are using our own oil? As far as i know,our high quality oil is exported out to other countries and we buy back crude petrol for our own vehicles.Someone wants to earn lots of money here. The tax issue will never go away,just that it wont be this high like a few hundred percent which is ridiculous. Diesel roadtax was expensive,but if you tend to travel a lot.You still save in a long run.Diesel engine do have a lot of problem back in the 90s,as it's noisy,shaky steering and lower performance.It's no longer the case now. There will never be an even competitions between our shit cars and oversea's cars,with this current government.Nothing will ever improve if there is no fair competition and this problem also occurs in other industry like ISP. Thank good the Mak Cik crap did not happen. Better go down. Bye bye,Marion. *hugs However, the diesel roadtax which was high in west Malaysia alone, enough to deter diesel cars from being a good alternative for motoring public... Compare that to Sabah and Sarawak where diesel roadtax is much lower than peninsular, and even people who usually drive in urban area, also buy Toyota Hilux |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0306sec
0.21
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 08:45 PM |