AMD and INTEL

Lowyat.NET Lowyat.NET Rules and Regulations

FAQ Help Search Members Calendar

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

AMD and INTEL, Which one better??Amd or Intel

Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic

ayie_admin

Sep 8 2008, 07:02 AM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #21

Newbie

Group: Junior Member
Posts: 33
Joined: September 2008
From: isketambatu land negeri angis kus kus

amd = for gamers (extreme graphic)
intel = business,homes and etc

Actually, to choice the processor is depend on the user....what the kind or type of job user doing with their desktop or laptop, rite?...any comment or suggestions...how about ur thinking??

punkyswat

Sep 8 2008, 10:35 AM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #22

Freak

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,517
Joined: January 2007

QUOTE(evilhomura89 @ Sep 7 2008, 05:04 PM)

laptop...ppl usually go for Intel
desktop... ppl usually go for AMD

yea,desktop for amd is cheaper

dvlzplayground

Sep 8 2008, 11:06 AM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #23

Regular

Group: Junior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: July 2005
From: Kuching / Miri

QUOTE(ayie_admin @ Sep 8 2008, 07:02 AM)

amd = for gamers (extreme graphic)
intel = business,homes and etc

Actually, to choice the processor is depend on the user....what the kind or type of job user doing with their desktop or laptop, rite?...any comment or suggestions...how about ur thinking??

so wrong.

Read the latest news people...this perception about "AMD = gaming, Intel = home" was only true back in ~ 2004. Right now Intel is doing much better than AMD in almost all markets. Xeon, penryn, atom...and the upcoming larrabee and nehalem..all these are pushing intel up to the top. but im not saying AMD is bad...they're still a good choice, but no great reason to go to AMD over intel yet.

but AMD is still in the game and MAY triumph over intel with their fusion chips later. the future will tell us.

astria

Sep 8 2008, 11:15 AM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #24

Surrender Is Not An Option

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,356
Joined: August 2008
From: Singapore, Hong Kong

AMD for budget user...

Intel for high performance user...

that's for now... we'll see how Phenom FX Deneb perform next year... 4Ghz sure sounds yummy...

OlgaC4

Sep 8 2008, 11:21 AM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #25

Regular

Group: Junior Member
Posts: 119
Joined: November 2006

If you game a lot you will notice that AMD performance is unstable, sometime first and sometime slow. Intel is much more stable as they lock the maximum speed.

RyanTham

Sep 8 2008, 11:42 AM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #26

Dj Ryan

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 520
Joined: January 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur,Cheras

depents on platform i think anyway..
and new amd puma have come out....ati graphic...yeah yeah
AMD PUMA !!!!!!!!!!check out compaq cq45 series...

swaichia

Sep 8 2008, 12:23 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #27

Regular

Group: Junior Member
Posts: 444
Joined: January 2003

Intel ATOM is good with electricity comsumption... those MID laptop with ATOM processor is cool

iRonTech

Sep 8 2008, 12:38 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #28

Access Denied

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 7,885
Joined: November 2004

QUOTE(ayie_admin @ Sep 8 2008, 07:02 AM)

amd = for gamers (extreme graphic)
intel = business,homes and etc

Actually, to choice the processor is depend on the user....what the kind or type of job user doing with their desktop or laptop, rite?...any comment or suggestions...how about ur thinking??

if amd = for gamers, im sure the lapdesk/top no problem for business/home right?

QUOTE(RyanTham @ Sep 8 2008, 11:42 AM)

depents on platform i think anyway..
and new amd puma have come out....ati graphic...yeah yeah
AMD PUMA !!!!!!!!!!check out compaq cq45 series...

CQ-40 better

Duckies

Sep 8 2008, 02:37 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #29

Regular

Group: Junior Member
Posts: 385
Joined: June 2008
From: Ipoh,Malaysia

QUOTE

AMD for budget user...

Intel for high performance user...

that's for now... we'll see how Phenom FX Deneb perform next year... 4Ghz sure sounds yummy...

I agreed with that.

QUOTE

depents on platform i think anyway..
and new amd puma have come out....ati graphic...yeah yeah
AMD PUMA !!!!!!!!!!check out compaq cq45 series...

Oh yea..how's the performance of the new PUMA?Can fight against Intel Centrino 2?

jeff_ckf

Sep 8 2008, 02:45 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #30

Enthusiast

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 675
Joined: September 2007
From: Penang

QUOTE(Duckies @ Sep 8 2008, 02:37 PM)

Oh yea..how's the performance of the new PUMA?Can fight against Intel Centrino 2?

Clock for clock PUMA can't fight Centrino 2. But if you factor in the graphics performance where PUMA has ATI HD 3200 vs Intel's rather mediocre but buffed up GMA X4500, then can fight. But that depends on what you want to do with your laptop.

I would go for PUMA if looking at the price/performance ratio and go for Centrino 2 if money is not an issue for its stability and higher bus speed (and branding if you are into that)

astria

Sep 8 2008, 03:06 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #31

Surrender Is Not An Option

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,356
Joined: August 2008
From: Singapore, Hong Kong

waiting for XGP... gamers dream...

Cheesenium

Sep 8 2008, 05:42 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 1-) | Post #32

Pro Imperator nos addo nex

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,820
Joined: August 2006
From: Sydney

QUOTE(ayie_admin @ Sep 8 2008, 07:02 AM)

amd = for gamers (extreme graphic)
intel = business,homes and etc

Actually, to choice the processor is depend on the user....what the kind or type of job user doing with their desktop or laptop, rite?...any comment or suggestions...how about ur thinking??

Thats few years ago.Intel is pawning AMD now.

QUOTE(OlgaC4 @ Sep 8 2008, 11:21 AM)

If you game a lot you will notice that AMD performance is unstable, sometime first and sometime slow. Intel is much more stable as they lock the maximum speed.

Yeah,AMD processor are also not so good in multitasking.Intel's chips are much better.

Golden

Sep 8 2008, 05:51 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #33

Regular

Group: Junior Member
Posts: 482
Joined: October 2005

Choose Intel if you want stability.

Choose AMD if you want to overclock your processor...

shahiryusoff

Sep 8 2008, 06:03 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #34

Regular

Group: Junior Member
Posts: 83
Joined: December 2006
From: Seremban

i also don't really know which 1 is better..but by the way,i just bought Acer Aspire M5201..using AMD Phenom X4...kinda stupid bought this one since u guys says that AMD is not very good..i actually have been using intel for the past 5 years and just a week a ago my dad bought me AMD..don't really like it..should have just bought Intel C2D better..

Perfect-Stranger

Sep 8 2008, 08:05 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #35

做人如果没梦想，同咸鱼有甚么分别

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 879
Joined: August 2007

Choose AMD only if you want TOP performance for gaming and Graphic design purpose.
Other than that, better use Intel =)

astria

Sep 8 2008, 09:56 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #36

Surrender Is Not An Option

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,356
Joined: August 2008
From: Singapore, Hong Kong

QUOTE(Perfect-Stranger @ Sep 8 2008, 08:05 PM)

Choose AMD only if you want TOP performance for gaming and Graphic design purpose.
Other than that, better use Intel =)

so wrong again...

that was back in the times of Athlon64 vs Pentium 4...

for now, AMD can't perform well in high end market...

as i ve said, AMD for budget users, Intel for high performance users...

AMDAthlon

Sep 8 2008, 10:27 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #37

The AMD's /ATi Member Since 1995

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 2,617
Joined: August 2007
From: AMD's ATi Universe

This thread is full of zz
AMD cannot multi-task la,Intel can la..- -
AMD cannot multi task,less stable?Why take it?

Cheesenium

Sep 8 2008, 10:32 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 1-) | Post #38

Pro Imperator nos addo nex

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,820
Joined: August 2006
From: Sydney

QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ Sep 8 2008, 10:27 PM)

AMD cannot multi-task la,Intel can la..- -

Thats what i notice when i use my AMD Athlon XP.Dont ask me why.

That rig is bad in multitasking compare to my old P4 1.6GHz.

dvlzplayground

Sep 8 2008, 10:56 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #39

Regular

Group: Junior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: July 2005
From: Kuching / Miri

QUOTE(shahiryusoff @ Sep 8 2008, 06:03 PM)

i also don't really know which 1 is better..but by the way,i just bought Acer Aspire M5201..using AMD Phenom X4...kinda stupid bought this one since u guys says that AMD is not very good..i actually have been using intel for the past 5 years and just a week a ago my dad bought me AMD..don't really like it..should have just bought Intel C2D better..

y dont u like AMD?

QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Sep 8 2008, 10:32 PM)

Thats what i notice when i use my AMD Athlon XP.Dont ask me why.

That rig is bad in multitasking compare to my old P4 1.6GHz.

that may be true since youre talking about Athlon XP vs Pentium 4

that was the case back then

AMDAthlon

Sep 9 2008, 12:09 AM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #40

The AMD's /ATi Member Since 1995

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 2,617
Joined: August 2007
From: AMD's ATi Universe

The past is past..Then why not i compare Athlon 64 and Pentium 4?So its the same thing,same like last time AMD hot,now AMD processor explodes le?

« Next Oldest · Mobile Computing · Next Newest »