Java and VB.Net
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Java and VB.Net
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 03:17 PM
Show posts by this member only |This post's rating (0+, 0-) | Post
#21
|
|
Look at all my stars!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Senior Member Posts: 2,182 Ratings earned: 0+, 0- Ratings given: 0+, 0- Joined: Nov 2005 |
QUOTE(sennheiser @ Apr 5 2008, 07:33 PM) same goes to MSIL (.net bytecode). it can be decompiled using msil dasm or .net reflector. n about obfuscators, i think they are plain useless. they just make things hard for humans to read, but not impossible for machines to interpret. I run my app's msil through rijndael-256 encryption and wrapped it with a decryption class coded in C++ (compiled to native code). The assembly is invoke using interop. Nice idea. Might be thinking of implementing future codes this way. Way to go sennheiser! QUOTE(sennheiser @ Apr 6 2008, 05:54 AM) In memory decryption can at least prevent casual users from peeking into your codes. Even native codes can still be reverse engineered by professionals. No code is safe Agree. Most people just hide/obfuscate/encrypt their codes just to make life "harder" for those who intend to peak into the code "illegally". No code is safe, unless you don't let others use your program. ~Cheers! |
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 03:41 PM
Show posts by this member only |This post's rating (0+, 0-) | Post
#22
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Junior Member Posts: 26 Ratings earned: 0+, 0- Ratings given: 0+, 0- Joined: Mar 2008 |
How abt start fr C++?
C++ is a OO language and very strong in OO. If we can understand it, then we can learn another language is more easy. r ur agree? |
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 03:03 PM
Show posts by this member only |This post's rating (0+, 0-) | Post
#23
|
|
Getting Started ![]() ![]() Group: Junior Member Posts: 58 Ratings earned: 0+, 0- Ratings given: 0+, 0- Joined: Jan 2008 |
i choice java, coz platform dependencies .
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th March 2010 - 04:23 AM |