Lowyat.NET Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages < 1 2 
RSS feedReply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> C3, Another great product fr Edifier

wingwp
post Jan 12 2008, 10:46 PM


Regular
**

Group: Junior Member
Posts: 134
Joined: January 2003





Just grabbed 1 @ 338RM

gone to Edifier Showroom.. but closed

a best value buy, better than pay for 200RM+ speaker

Mid sound quite weak, treble is a bit fake, uhuh.. but overall very nice

..8" subwoofer gd for movie watchin too, no pecah sound at max volume

ps.. pay more for S2.1 @ 399RM also not bad, just tat lack of external amp, treble control & remote control but better build & tighter sound
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kucingfight
post Jan 13 2008, 05:13 PM


I Want My B00bs back!!
Group Icon

Group: Elite
Posts: 3,162
Joined: January 2003
From: Sitiawan / USJ / Putra Heights / PJ







juz bought C3 @ Rm330 at sri comp, free earphone.

had my mine set on it already, but was curious how good was M3300 & R501. I was pretty amazed with M3300 for its price. definitely doesnt sound like Sub RM250 speakers.

headed over to Sri comp to had a test on C3, S520D & R501. S520D is definitely out of my budget, but was curious how it stacked against C3. in all, there was noticeable differences. sounded sharper (i'm not an audiophile, so i cant really describe those jargons) . R501 sounded good too, but was a bit 'rough' not refined enof compared to C3.


Added on January 13, 2008, 5:18 pmjuz bought C3 @ Rm330 at sri comp, free earphone.

had my mine set on it already, but was curious how good was M3300 & R501. I was pretty amazed with M3300 for its price. definitely doesnt sound like Sub RM250 speakers.

headed over to Sri comp to had a test on C3, S520D & R501. S520D is definitely out of my budget, but was curious how it stacked against C3. in all, there was noticeable differences. sounded sharper (i'm not an audiophile, so i cant really describe those jargons) . R501 sounded good too, but was a bit 'rough' not refined enof compared to C3.

This post has been edited by kucingfight: Jan 13 2008, 05:18 PM
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
shinbak
post Mar 8 2008, 03:20 AM


Newbie
*

Group: New Member
Posts: 4
Joined: March 2008





after using C3 for quite a few month, overall comment is not bad, but cant satisfy me!!

i got something to ask about C3, izzit possible i modify the c3 amp into 5.1 and support dts??? kakaka
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages < 1 2
Bump TopicReply to this topicTopic OptionsStart new topic
 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th September 2008 - 05:33 PM
All Rights Reserved 2003-2008 Vijandren Ramadass (~why so serious?~)
Hosting powered by IPServerOne - a Malaysian Web Hosting Company