u think toyota will let perodua produce 1.5 cc car?

then what will happen to toyota hatchback?

should i add extra 50k just for a toyota badge?

so do u think Vvti= dvvt??
later pls dont compare Vtec/mivec with Dvvt... dvvt totally junk
come on laa. Japanese wudnt give all their tech to pelodua laa..
tat y FC figure myvi/passo is different.. they give u different ECU

1.5cc <> 1.3cc mah....vvti got 1.3cc?

Izit avanza using 1.3 vvti or what? Yes.. Toyota Avanza 1.3 is using vvt-i engine..

This post has been edited by singchaii: May 19 2007, 01:37 PM

Calling Kcng! we have new show to watch! Dont forget for some popcorn!


Ur post shows how naive and inmature are you. Just to be fair with you, the viva is still new and i have no idea how it will perform on city driving,, highway,genting, how good the FC will be and the economy running cost. Time will tell once viva owners willing to share their experience.

Variable valve timing is used to boost efficiency and improves fuel economy, provided if its properly tuned. Variable valve timing is also used to produce optimum power at certain revs, like the vtec.

Seriously i think u better rest this topic or else more ppl will end up bashing u.

This post has been edited by travis_ckf: May 19 2007, 01:41 PM

Hi wassup bro..
I am BACK

Before you fellas make all sorts of assumptions about the Viva being heavier than the Kelisa... go here to check your facts:

Kelisa - http://www.perodua.com.my/our_cars.php?sub...v=specification

and here:

Viva - http://www.perodua.com.my/our_cars.php?sub...v=specification

You will see that the heaviest Viva AT (800kg kerb) is actually lighter than the lightest Kelisa MT (801kg). The lightest Viva 1.0 MT is only 785kg which is 16kg lighter than the equivalent Kelisa MT.

If you ask me, I'm not sure how Daihatsu did it, but they have made a bigger and better car with a modest weight reduction to boot. Amazing shit.

And comparing the 1.0L engines, the Viva's engine actually has more than 10% more power (+5KW) than the Kelisa's engine, with roughly the same torque (a marginal +2NM).

With regards to the specs only, the Viva 1.0 (with its lower weight and higher power) will run circles around the Kelisa 1.0.

This post has been edited by seantang: May 19 2007, 01:51 PM

hey is wira SE good?... anyone is having that car?
why no one compare wira SE "1.5" with viva? since same price range

that place hulu ah? lol maybe its between sepang lol



powerful, but can a vios run circles around the AE101? go figure.

viva use cheaper and thin bodyshell

oi bro travis... stop jumping to thread calling everyone immature man
thats just his opinion about dvvt....=.=
btw ur opinion is too bias maybe u own a perodua kar?

This post has been edited by CoupeFan: May 19 2007, 01:52 PM

Before you start talking rubbish, go find out what the crash test ratings are first.

i only can find daihatsu Mira crash test rating.. not a viva
dont say mira=viva pls

so does myvi.. i only can find sirion crash test.. not myvito

This post has been edited by Boxy: May 19 2007, 01:58 PM

I won't. A proper comparison is the Kelisa vs the Viva.

So what you're saying is that you have no information to support your statement.

ViVa + Kelisa = Junk.

This post has been edited by rifle_m16: May 19 2007, 02:06 PM

hv u guys read viva test drive report from Mr Chips (motortrader)?
he said kelisa is more fun to drive and handles better than viva

i prefer kelisa than viva

Yah..kelisa for me anytime.
but if i have a choice, savvy<kelisa<viva

for me ......kelisa<motor kapchai<scooter<viva

say what u wanna say man......the viva IS UGLY.

among malaysians, looks=very important. u dun see them buying that renault godknowsuglyashellcar here despite it being very economical and functional.

looks can be subjective, but so far, 20/20 ppl i've asked said the viva looks ugly. i personally think the viva is hella plastic. oh heck, i think it won't sell.