Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

8 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Singapore vs Brunei - 50 Years Economy Progress

views
     
SUSsoundsyst64
post May 5 2012, 07:52 PM, updated 14y ago

I'm No-Longer-Noobs
*******
Senior Member
3,725 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: In /hardware/

credit to mevotex @ miricommunity.net

In economic case studies, Southeast Asian economists inevitably, have a penchant to compare Brunei and Singapore, the 2 smallest but wealthiest Southeast Asian states whom both shared a currency interchangeable agreement. A tale of 2 nations, Brunei and Singapore set out to diversify their economies 60 years ago, and diverged their path from there; one adopted an open, meritocratic system with emphasis to absorb the best and brightest foreign talents; another embraced a closed, ethnocentric structure which placed heavy restrictions on foreigners. The result is a real-life model lesson for other Southeast Asian states.

user posted image
One couldn't imagine this was Singapore in 1960s, plagued with housing crisis and filled with slums and squatters


---------------------------------- 1950s -----------------------------------


By 1950s, Brunei had recovered from the ashes of World War 2. The destruction in war however, especially to its oil facilities, made Brunei aware of the needs to diversify its economy. At that time there was only one known reservoir in Seria, and the fear of it running out led the country to set forward and introduced the first National Development Plan (NDP) with an allocation of $100 million in 1953. The plan seek to lay the foundation for economic development by building infrastructure (communication systems, roads, water, electricity), and providing healthcare and education to all districts so to create a healthy, educated workforce.

Singapore suffered heavily in World War 2. The British boasted the island as the 'Gilbratar of the East', a fortress that would withstand any attack, so the Japanese blockaded it and gave it air bombings everyday to inflict maximum damages, until the surrender of the island in 1942. By 1950s though, Singapore had been stabilized enough to again focus on economic development.

user posted image
Brunei: Seria 1950s, nation was undergoing mass infrastructure development

Emerged from the war in physical ruins, Singapore found itself with a large number of homeless residents whose homes were destroyed, and insufficient commercial activities to support them, leading to housing crisis, squatters and high unemployment which plagued the island throughout the 1950s. In 1947, the British Housing Committee Report noted Singapore had "one of the world’s worst slums - a disgrace to a civilized community", with the average person per building density was 18.2 by 1947 and high-rise buildings were rare. In 1959, the problem of shortage was still unsolved, and the people of Singapore was already not happy with the British as their leaders.

The British authorities granted Singapore and Brunei the power of self-government in 1959, but the colonial administration still controlled external foreign relations and shared responsibilities in matters such as police and defense.


---------------------------------- 1960s -----------------------------------


Going into 1960s, Brunei had became a livable place with booming economic activities, and a GDP per capita 3 times higher than Singapore. A second reservoir in South West Ampa field was discovered, further boosting oil revenues. Oil exports account for 92% of the economy while rubber exports 1.5%

A simple statistics in 1960, Brunei, with a population of slightly under 0.1 million, exported $326 million worth of goods, impressively compared to Singaporean (1.64 million population) exports of $543 million. The Sultanate was clearly way ahead of the Lion City at this time.

user posted image
Singapore 1960s: Chinatown, a chaotic slums, common occurrence throughout the country.

Suffocated by high unemployment and housing crisis, Singapore in mid-1950s identified industrialization as the way to diversify and keeping the economy afloat. The entrepot trade accounted for 70% of the economy at that time, but was deemed shaky as Malaysia and Indonesia could commit themselves to build a rival port across the strategic Strait of Malacca anytime. This came true when Malaysia later built the Port Klang, eventually growing into the closest competition against the Port of Singapore in Southeast Asia.

The 1950-1960s was a completely different era for Singapore. There was little or no foreign investments, and if Singapore wished to industrialize, it must carry them out on its own, under limited budget. So serious was the economic problems that in 1963 Singapore decided to join the Federation of Malaysia in hope to solve its stagnated economy and other social issues.

Singapore began 'forced industrialization', building cheap factories in mass quantities and sent the unemployed to work there, setting up the Jurong industrial estate, its first industrial town. Singapore's industrialization programme began with factories producing garments, textiles, toys, wood products and hair wigs. The Housing and Development Board (HDB) was formed in 1960 to solve Singapore's housing crisis, and to clear up the squatters and slums. It began to construct what is known as HDB flats to resettle the population. Only after nearly 20 years, and the building of tens of thousands of flats, Singapore's housing problems was finally solved at late 1970s.

user posted image
Brunei 1960s: Clearly a better place than Singapore

The merger with Malaysia did not go well, Singapore was rocked by racial riot in 1964 (Brunei was similarly hit by a revolt in 1962) and the increasing tension with Kuala Lumpur led to its expulsion from the Malaysian federation in 1965. By the time Singapore was ejected from Malaysia, its economy was in a very bad shape and Western analysts were predicting that the new country, with no resource at all, could not survive. No one at that time could had known that, in 2012 Singapore would be one of the most developed nation on Earth.


---------------------------------- 1970s -----------------------------------


The 1970s was a good time for Brunei. Angered by Western support for Israel, Arab nations launched the oil boycott, leading to the 1970s energy crisis and oil price shock. This gave Brunei a windfall and awashed it with petrodollar, followed by a sharp rise in living standard; for instance, just before the energy crisis in 1972, Brunei's per capita GDP was $2,926, but in 1973 it blossomed to $6,971 - even more than Japan's $4,157. By 1980, per capita in Brunei hit $25,538; the richest in Asia, compared to Japan's $9,034 and Singapore's $4,857. It was from here onwards the tiny Sultanate is to be forever associated with the word 'rich and wealthy'. It was also at here Brunei reached its greatest extent, never again in future would it had so wide a lead vis-a-vis Singapore and Japan.

Today, the 1970s golden age and the fact that Brunei was once Asia's richest in GDP per capita at that time, is rarely mentioned in the country, perhaps due to the embarrassment it might brought with the country's currently struggling economy.

user posted image
Brunei 1970s: Good infrastructure, thriving commerce

Sudden boom in oil revenues allowed Brunei to enter a period of rapid economic growth, with oil income greatly expended to modernize the state. In 1974 it built the Brunei International Airport (1 year before Singapore Changi Airport was built in 1975), the country was able to connect itself with properly paved roads, commerce flourished and new wealth was created (many companies founded at this period went on to become the leading retailers in the country today), telecommunication greatly improved, infrastructure was better than Singapore, and education level rose sharply. The future of the Sultanate looked bright.

Despite that though, oil has given Brunei a sense of complacency. Other industries who once made up a considerable share of exports, like coal, rubber and cutch, were increasingly being neglected. Singapore was facing existential and survival threats, that forced it to act, while Brunei was able to sit comfortably on its oil revenues. Even though the 1970s was modern Brunei's best times, it also solidified its reliance on oil & gas.

After building factories continuously for 15 years, in 1970, Singapore finally got its high unemployment solved. There were some issues though, unlike Brunei who were rich enough to fund all developmental projects, the city-state was poor and could only afford to build flats and factories all these while.

Sorting housing crisis and high unemployment were the first priorities at that time, and infrastructure and education were left aside. In 1970, Singapore began to realize that no matter how much low-cost factories it built, it is only a tiny nation with tiny population, and neighboring Malaysia and Indonesia can eventually field a much larger labor force. There is no way it can compete if that occurred, but if Singapore has highly-educated workforce and high tech industries, it would be able to stay ahead.

user posted image
Singapore early 1970s: Road much better and streets cleaner with slums cleared

Noting its poor infrastructure and low level of education, Singapore then stopped the mass-construction of factories, and instead allocated the funds to education, infrastructure development and factories upgrade. But the country wasn't rich and the budget couldn't support all the projects. Moreover it would take at least one decade before the new batch of highly-skilled workforce could be produced, something the city-state couldn't afford to wait. Singapore decided it wasn't plausible to do it by its own, and appealed to foreigners, opening up the country to foreign investments and skilled foreign immigrants.

The Singaporean leadership promised foreign companies what they loved to hear; the government would be incorruptible, the government would respect capitalism and all foreign investments, with no nationalization or seizure of assets would ever take place, and that Singapore would have regular and predictable law - many third World governments encourage investments but then change the rules at will, this would not be applicable to Singapore. The Lion City kept its promises and enforced them religiously. This differentiated Singapore with other third world nations, and successfully caught the attention of international businesses. Foreign investments began to flush into Singapore.

Sensing that it had won foreign interests, Singapore moved to offer "goodies" like tax concessions, simplified immigration procedures, tariff protection and exemption from import duties, and finally the lifting of foreign exchange controls. This pleased multinational corporations even more and they flocked in en masses, whose capital helped sped up Singapore's development by at least 10 years ahead. The rapid industrialization of Singapore also greatly aided it attracts large pool of talented foreigners, with the skill inflow so massive that, by 2011, 40% of Singapore's population are immigrants (27% non-citizens and another 13% foreign naturalized citizens)

user posted image
Singapore late 1970s: with mass influx of foreign investments, modern high-rise replacing old buildings

The Singaporean government adopted a business-friendly approach and actively adapt to their needs, for example, in 1970s, when high-tech industries abroad informed Singapore that they wanted labors with adequate technical skills, the city-state immediately launched free government training institutes which would train working adults twice a week for 3-hour sessions over a period of two year to meet that demands. IT companies like Apple Computers was satisfied and located its facilities to Singapore. The good governance, responsive and proactive economic policies of the island attracted even Shell and Esso, who constructed the world's third largest oil-refinery center on Singapore. The foundation to make Singapore a future first world industrialized nation, was planted in this period.


---------------------------------- 1980s -----------------------------------


Stepping into 1980s, the energy crisis had calmed and oil prices subsided. This hit Brunei hard and GDP fell sharply, a price to pay for failing to identify and develop alternate industries in the golden 70s. After Sultanate attained independence in 1984, economic diversification was again being raised. There were 2 economic paths Brunei could take; the nation's environment was ripe for rapid industrialization at the time, but would require the huge absorption of foreign workers. This was the developmental model later taken up by wealthy Gulf states like Kuwait, Dubai and Qatar in their industrialization progress.

Qatar absorbed so much foreign workers that in 2011 the Qatari only account for 20% of the population. Similar case can be applied to Kuwait where only 33% of its population at the moment is Kuwaiti. For Dubai, only 17% of its population are Emirati. Dubai however, has successfully diversified its economy with oil and natural gas currently accounted for less than 6% of the government's revenues.

user posted image
Brunei 1980s: Seria, excellent infrastructure, living standard high, but very slow progress

Foreign worker absorption of such extent though, is rather impossible in Brunei due to the country's MIB (Melayu Islam Beraja: Malay Islamic Monarchy) philosophy that stressed the ethnic Malay, who make up the majority of Brunei's population, must always remain dominant race in the country. The conservative social and political nature of Brunei also played its role in the hesitation towards opening up the country; the fears that an influx of foreign elements may disrupt the nation's social customs, tradition and religion, together with the concerns that local Bruneian Malay entrepreneurs may not be ready for intense international competition, means the Sultanate would not be seeing the same kind of massive foreign participation like in Singapore.

Plan for industrialization was dropped (which it came to regret later) in favor of investing Brunei's huge foreign reserves overseas. Among Brunei's investments include luxurious hotels in North America and Europe frequented by top ranking Bruneian officials (which later merged to form the Dorchester Collection), the Willeroo Cattle Farm in Australia, which itself is larger than the entire Brunei, and various property assets across the world. The dependence on oil hence continued, though the fisheries and retail industries saw significant expansion at this time.

On the other hand, as a result of massive foreign investments and rapid industrialization, Singapore had emerged as an Asian economic tiger by 1980s. Its industries at this time had been upgraded and equipped with sophisticated technologies way ahead of all other ASEAN states. The country's capital-intensive industrial base had been setup and was ready to transform itself into an advanced, high tech economy. Around this time, as part of its high-tech drive, the island successfully attracted Southeast Asia's first wafer fabrication plant, which by 2011 would help Singapore produced 10% of the world's silicon wafer. The dependence on foreign firms was also noted, in 1980, foreign-owned firms accounted for 73.7% of Singapore's gross output, and 84.7% of its direct exports.

user posted image
Singapore 1980s: City central already well-developed with towers

During the 1980s, Singapore's industries had expanded to electronics, computer, shipbuilding and repairing, oil rig construction, chemicals, petroleum refining, and raw materials refining like rubber processing. The first ever economic recession since independence however, took the country by surprise in 1985, devastated Singaporean economy and sent its rapid growth into negative.

The government quickly identified the problems and responded by freezing wages, lowering taxes, and reducing Central Provident Fund contributions. The island was able to nurse itself back to health by 1988, but learnt the painful way that while trying to diversify the economy, it focused too much on high-tech manufacturing. Such lesson would forever changed Singapore, and the country decided to further diverse into service industries as the 'second growth engine', concentrating on the likes of IT, telecommunications, engineering, banking & finance, and medical, while adding more varieties to manufacturing. In 1987, the country built its first MRT line.

This post has been edited by soundsyst64: Jun 24 2012, 09:03 AM
SUSsoundsyst64
post May 5 2012, 07:53 PM

I'm No-Longer-Noobs
*******
Senior Member
3,725 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: In /hardware/


---------------------------------- 1990s -----------------------------------


With little industrial development, the Bruneian economy began to slow down in 1990s. Increasing emphasis on MIB as a state ideology has also resulted in the banning of alcohol, nightclubs, public celebration of Christmas, and commercial pig farming in 1991. The period also marked a critical time for Brunei; Singapore per capita GDP had grown dangerously near Brunei, while other ASEAN states like Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand were waking up from their economic slumber.

user posted image
Brunei 1990s: modern high-rise over capital

Realizing the mistake of not taking part in industrialization earlier on, and being aware that the country might fall behind if industrialization still doesn't take place, the 1991-1995 Brunei's NDP called for industrial promotion and expansion. A number of industrial estates were identified, this include those in capital Bandar Seri Begawan and the Beribi industrial estates, with factories focusing on furniture, pottery, tiles, cement, chemicals, plywood, glass, textiles, food and electrical.

Brunei's push for industrialization came 40 years late. It was something Singapore had done in the 1950s. By that time the wages in Brunei were already considered too high, the industrial base too limited, and technological edge too low to compete with larger neighboring state in terms of scale and cost (ironically, this was the exact concerns in Singapore during the 1960s which led it to shift into high-tech industrial platform)

Moreover, bureaucratic difficulties, poor coordination between government departments, and lengthy approval process deterred foreign investments, which mean the country couldn't count on foreign multinationals unlike Singapore to develop its underdeveloped industrial sector. The country must proceed on its own instead.

Brunei then began a period of 'state-led construction growth' (similar to Singapore's 1960s 'stated-led industrial growth'), initiated a plethora of construction phases and plans across the entire country, leading to the 1990s construction boom to diversify from an oil-reliant economy to one that is service- and tourism-oriented (it was also what Dubai did since 2000) The restriction on foreign workers were temporarily relaxed to allow large-scale projects and landmarks to be constructed, among them were a theme park, a magnificent hotel, and a giant power station.

user posted image
Singapore 1990s: rich, robust and modern

All these however, was abruptly disrupted in the Asian financial crisis 1997-98. It is not clear if Brunei could have achieved a similar kind of development like in Dubai shall the construction plannings were to be continued. Soon after the construction spree took off, Dubai enacted a law in 2002 that allows non-nationals of the UAE to own property, leading to an inflow of foreign professionals and real estate boom. This was not seen in Brunei, who remains staunchly opposed to foreign ownership.

The Asian crisis shattered Brunei's economy, wiped out half its foreign reserves it never recovered from, and put it to sleep. After that, the country seemingly lost its ambition and economic direction, which would later saw it descended into the slowest-growing economy in the region by next decade.

Singapore had became an exciting place in the 1990s, it had advanced into NICs (Newly Industrialized Country), and was regarded as the land of opportunities. The island had also matured to become the third most important financial center in Asia after Tokyo and Hong Kong. The development and industrialization of Singapore was so rapid at this time it warranted the needs of land reclamation to accommodate new industries. In 1960, the size of Singapore was 581.5 sq km, this had been expanded to 710 sq km in 2011. The country is in progress of adding another 20 sq km of lands from sea.

user posted image
Singapore overtook the UK by GDP per capita in 1990, all done without natural resources

Explosive industrial growth also mean that the country, in a sudden, found itself having not enough skilled labors. The city-state sweetened its immigration policies; highly-educated foreign talents from anywhere around the world choosing to work in Singapore, would be granted fast-paced PR (Permanent Resident) The huge inflow of top talents gave Singapore a highly competent labor force. In 1996, Singapore was ranked by the World Economic Forum as the most competitive economy in the world. Business Environment Risk Intelligence has rated Singapore's workforce as the best every year since 1980.

An extremely skilled workforce further strengthened its high-tech manufacturing and domestic competitiveness. The country had bred a new generation of local entrepreneurs who successfully competed with and took back the Singaporean economy from foreigners, not by affirmative acts but meritocracy. In 1980, foreign firms contribution to the economy was 73%, but in 1998, Singaporean-owned companies contributed 55% to the economy.

The Asian financial crisis put Singapore into recession, but the government immediately worked out a solution to allow for a gradual 20% depreciation of the Singapore dollar, to bring forward in advance government programs such as the Interim Upgrading Program and other construction related projects, pre-emptively agreed to CPF cuts to lower labor costs, and made no attempt to directly intervene in the capital markets, allowing the Straits Times Index to drop 60%. In less than a year after crisis, the Singaporean economy fully recovered and continued on its growth trajectory.

By the end of 1990s, Singaporean firms are ready to go global. The country signed 13 Free Trade Agreements in order to expand its external trade ties, and advised local companies to go regional. The companies would later be among the largest investors in China, Vietnam, Cambodia, Myanmar and Indonesia.

---------------------------------- 2000s -----------------------------------


Even though the Sultanate did not witness social unrest as seen in neighboring Malaysia and Indonesia at the height of financial crisis, by 2000s, Brunei began to focus on social consolidation and Islamization to preserve 'stability and harmony'. Since 2000, the country's economic stagnation was confirmed, which would led it to become the ASEAN economic laggard later on.

user posted image
If we adjust the GDP per capita to inflation, Bruneians are actually richer in the late 1970s than now

user posted image
Singapore GDP per capita adjusted to inflation revealed that Singaporeans today are 4 more richer than in 1970s, compare that to the Bruneian charts above

The 1990s drive for industrialization did not create a thriving manufacturing industries like that of Singapore. Manufacturing in Brunei had never accounted for more than 3% of GDP (it occupied approximately 27% of the Singaporean GDP, 13% of Dubai GDP and 1% Bruneian GDP as of 2011) The government however, refused to accept that it failed on what others succeed (Malta, Luxembourg and Iceland, 3 countries having the closest population to Brunei, for instance, their manufacturing industries accounted for 18-27% while Brunei a mere 1%)

Brunei continues to make attempts for manufacturing, such as partnering with Heidelberg on cement production, Alcoa on aluminum smeltering, and finally the high profile Sg Liang SPARK project with Mitsubishi/Itochu to produce Methanol.

One of the challenges for Brunei though, is the failure to secure consecutive follow-up investments. In its pursue for a strong semiconductor industry, Singapore attracted its first silicon wafer plant in the 1980s, since then this is followed by investments from many other corporations and the island now has 14 silicon wafer plant, 20 semiconductor assembly and test operations center, and about 40 integrated circuit design centres, making it currently the world #2 silicon wafer producer after Taiwan. In Brunei, follow-up investments from other companies after the first, is rare.

Throughout 2000s, Brunei had also tried to expand into service industries such as offshore financial banking, and tourism, with little success. Efforts was also made in food & agriculture, however, the food sufficiency target has not been reached as of 2011. Recognizing that its industries could not compete without a higher level of technologies, Brunei established the iCenter, with aim to nurture the country's technical skills. This is however, again, 40 years late. It was what Singapore had done in the late 1960s.

user posted image
SPARK - another project attempted to industrialize Brunei

Malaysia and Thailand, whose industries are getting more sophisticated and capital-intensive (i.e. the 1980s Singapore) possess a far advanced industrial technologies estimated 20 years ahead of Brunei, and while Indonesia and Vietnam, the 2 newly emerging economies, are considered low-tech, they have huge production base which Brunei couldn't possibly match.

The 2000s was a period of great economic leap for Singapore. Its diversification into service industries materialized. Singapore had became the medical hub for Southeast Asia, its technological and communication hub, with 50% market share of the region's datacenter capacity. The country's engineering feat is now world's renowned, being responsible for 70% market of global offshore rig construction and 20% of the world's ship repair market. The Port of Singapore surged to be the world's busiest (until it was overtaken in 2009 by Shanghai)

One of the challenges Singapore faced, is the increasing sophistication of industries in neighboring states such as Malaysia and Thailand, who are likewise getting more high-tech. By late 2000s, the computer peripheral industries had been largely lost to Malaysia who is able to produce it more cheaply, and electronics suffered decline, prompting Singapore to identify new industries to support its economy.

user posted image
Port of Singapore at night

Tourism, biotechnology and gambling were decided. After 40 years ban on casino in Singapore, the prohibition was reversed, perhaps seeing how much surplus and development gambling industries had brought Macau. Singapore set a new tourism goal of 15 million visitors by 2015 (the figure had reached 13 million in 2011) The country aggressively promote and develop its biotechnology industry, investing hundred of millions of dollars were into the sector to build up infrastructure, fund research and development and to recruit top international scientists to Singapore. As of now leading drug makers, such as GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Pfizer and Merck & Co., have set up plants in Singapore.

The country became a developed country in 2006. Singapore was hit by the global financial crisis 2008-2009 but again quickly rebounded. By the end of the decade, more than 3,000 multinational corporations (MNCs) from the United States, Japan, and Europe are investing in Singapore, in almost all sectors of the economy.


---------------------------------- 2010s -----------------------------------


By mid-2000s, Brunei has a new national vision, the 'Wawasan 2035 Negara Zikir', which called for a pure Islamic economy by 2035. Rapid Islamization then proceed, which include a compulsory Islamic studies for non-Muslim students. The central focus is on the 'Brunei Global Halal Brand', however it is not known how this would generate further revenues for the country. The 'Brunei Halal' actually humored Malaysia and Indonesia, with the two having a stronger Halal Brand and are among the biggest food producer in the Muslim world, but did not seek a global Halal authority like Brunei.

user posted image
Brunei 2010s - lagged behind Kuching and Kota Kinabalu

The country enacted a sudden credit card regulations in 2009, and in 2012 closed foreign property ownership through PA (Power of Attorney), with all laws being retroactive. This spooked investors and confirmed the fears of third world irregularities, the exact character Singapore promised investors in 1960s it would not be, leading to mass industrialization.

While the state concentrated on development towards building a knowledge-intensive economy, it seems to allow and ignore the continuation of brain-drain and skill outflow from the country. Upon its independence, one of the government's most important priorities is to encourage the development of Brunei Malays as leaders of industry and commerce. Participation of local Malays is required on tendering for contracts with the government or Brunei Shell Petroleum. The ethnic implementation on economic policies effectively deterred foreign talents inflow. In addition, a huge proportion of the country's Iban and Chinese population are denied citizenship, making them stateless.

With their future unsecured and not wanting the same nationality woes for their descendants, the Chinese, an economically active group in Brunei especially in the private sector, flee the country, taking with them their capital and skills to nations like Singapore, Australia and Canada. In 1960s, the ethnic Chinese accounted for 26% of Brunei's population, this had fallen to 18% in 1990s, and yet another plunge to an estimated 11% in 2010. By 2011, Brunei has 20,992 stateless population, amounted to 5% of its population. It is unclear if a knowledge economy could be fulfilled if the country is not willing to even embrace such percentage of its domestic-born population, exacerbating skilled labor shortages.

user posted image
ASEAN business survey 2012

The rest of ASEAN seemingly have the same views and sentiment on Brunei's economic environment, now stagnated and slowest-growing in the region. In April 2012, the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKY School), the National University of Singapore, and the Singapore Business Federation (SBF), in association with the ASEAN Business Advisory Council, conducted a survey among businessmen, investors and executives across various industries from all ten ASEAN member economies. The survey asked them which ASEAN countries they and their businesses would invest in.

In the survey, Indonesia was ranked the most favored investment destination to its ASEAN peers, while Brunei the least favored. While Bruneians may have different views, the ASEAN business communities are perceiving it as a nation in decline.

Running into 2010s, Singapore has increasingly focus on knowledge and innovation-intensive activities, with R&D now a cornerstone of the country’s economic development. In hope to maintain its wide technological edge, by 2012 Singapore will be spending $8.8 billion in R&D, with the 9 other ASEAN states combined will spend $8.5 billion. Malaysia will spend $3.2 billion, Indonesia $2.4 billion, Thailand $1.5 billion, Vietnam $0.8 billion, Philippines $0.5 billion while Brunei $0.03 billion.

user posted image

60 years of good governance and efficient economic planning is bearing fruit for Singapore. In 2010, the economy of Singapore overtook Malaysia, a country 5 times more populated and whom expelled it from the Federation nearly 50 years ago. But the greatest prize is perhaps, the GDP overtaking of rival Hong Kong, a dream Singapore harbored since independence.

Industries in Singapore now include electronics, chemicals, financial services, oil drilling equipment, petroleum refining, rubber processing and rubber products, processed food and beverages, ship repair, offshore platform construction, life sciences & biotech, and entrepot trade. Its innovative yet steadfast form of economics that combines economic planning with free-market has given it the nickname the Singapore Model. Strong export-oriented economy now provide more than enough revenues to purchase natural resources and raw goods which it does not have, a far cry from when it was still a poor and insecure state in the 1960s.

Again reviewing the export statistics, by 2011, the Singaporean (5.2 million population) exports was $409 billion compared to Brunei (0.47 million population) $10.7 billion, a sharp turn from 1960, it is now clear which country is way ahead of another.


Source:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/...g_economic.html

http://emergenteconomics.com/2012/03/12/718/

http://www.guidemesingapore.com/blog-post/...es-in-singapore

http://www.sedb.com/edb/sg/en_uk/index/abo.../the_2000s.html

http://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/Asia-an...re-ECONOMY.html

http://books.google.com.bn/books?id=z1cpiE...tsec=frontcover

http://library.thinkquest.org/C006891/reclamation.html

http://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/Asia-an...am-HISTORY.html

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb02...ag=content;col1

http://www.ats-sea.agr.gc.ca/ase/5674-eng.htm



freedom4me
post May 5 2012, 07:57 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
singapore beat malaysia?
+3kk!
post May 5 2012, 07:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,275 posts

Joined: May 2006
in before how malaysia cannot be singapore
Kampung2005
post May 5 2012, 07:57 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
I never regard Brunei as success story.

They depended too much on oil.
SUSPVCpipe
post May 5 2012, 08:00 PM

custom made
******
Senior Member
1,362 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: k.terengganu.. alone.. with my bass...play.. alone



singaporean cakap, singaporean dianak tirikan gomen, foreigner dibelai manja....
Currylaksa
post May 5 2012, 08:01 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,616 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse
Kampung2005
post May 5 2012, 08:02 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(PVCpipe @ May 5 2012, 08:00 PM)
singaporean cakap, singaporean dianak tirikan gomen, foreigner dibelai manja....
*
Singapore managed to grow its economy that can rival HK, Malaysia despite having no natural resources and no large market.

HK even during British days, has mainland China as economy support, but not Singapore.
SUSPVCpipe
post May 5 2012, 08:03 PM

custom made
******
Senior Member
1,362 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: k.terengganu.. alone.. with my bass...play.. alone



QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 5 2012, 08:02 PM)
Singapore managed to grow its economy that can rival HK, Malaysia despite having no natural resources and no large market.

HK even during British days, has mainland China as economy support, but not Singapore.
*
their economy mainly driven by foreign investment rite?
SUSruffaz
post May 5 2012, 08:07 PM

yes I am a noob
******
Senior Member
1,066 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: 127.0.0.1



their port helped them alot. meanwhile malaysia, doesnt even bother to compete with singapore. doh.gif
SUSPVCpipe
post May 5 2012, 08:10 PM

custom made
******
Senior Member
1,362 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: k.terengganu.. alone.. with my bass...play.. alone



QUOTE(ruffaz @ May 5 2012, 08:07 PM)
their port helped them alot. meanwhile malaysia, doesnt even bother to compete with singapore. doh.gif
*
we could rombak tambak johor, provide i lil shorter passage for ship...can build port also
+3kk!
post May 5 2012, 08:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,275 posts

Joined: May 2006
QUOTE(PVCpipe @ May 5 2012, 08:03 PM)
their economy mainly driven by foreign investment rite?
*
which country is not?

however to say that singapore is a FDI nation is not accurate these days, they have moved on to international trade and finance, Oil refining and shipping
empyreal
post May 5 2012, 08:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
2,036 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: KL



QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 5 2012, 08:02 PM)
Singapore managed to grow its economy that can rival HK, Malaysia despite having no natural resources and no large market.

HK even during British days, has mainland China as economy support, but not Singapore.
*
it doesnt matter. what matters is the concentration of people and urbanisation. the more people in a city, the more vibrant its economy, and this vibrancy is what leads to national economic growth. that's why underpopulated brunei lags behind singapore. even in the 1960s, brunei was better only in terms of 'living standards' - having more space, less congestion, etc. likewise, malaysia too is underpopulated, even discounting the rural areas, kl is small.

if you look at it in a macro view, why would kl and penang (or even new york, london or any large cities today) exist, since none of the cities have any mining, drilling or forestry industries within it?


Kampung2005
post May 5 2012, 08:13 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(PVCpipe @ May 5 2012, 08:03 PM)
their economy mainly driven by foreign investment rite?
*
Same like any country.

However, look at SIA, Creative, Capitaland, Singtel...all regional players hmm.gif
Kampung2005
post May 5 2012, 08:14 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(empyreal @ May 5 2012, 08:12 PM)
it doesnt matter. what matters is the concentration of people and urbanisation. the more people in a city, the more vibrant its economy, and this vibrancy is what leads to national economic growth. that's why underpopulated brunei lags behind singapore. even in the 1960s, brunei was better only in terms of 'living standards' - having more space, less congestion, etc. likewise, malaysia too is underpopulated, even discounting the rural areas, kl is small.

if you look at it in a macro view, why would kl and penang (or even new york, london or any large cities today) exist, since none of the cities have any mining, drilling or forestry industries within it?
*
That does not explain why gap between Malaysia and South Korea became much pronounced in 1980's.
old_and_slow
post May 5 2012, 08:17 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,602 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: Malaysia



QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 5 2012, 08:02 PM)
Singapore managed to grow its economy that can rival HK, Malaysia despite having no natural resources and no large market.

HK even during British days, has mainland China as economy support, but not Singapore.
*
they got brains. which comes from good and early education including diciplination.
SUSPVCpipe
post May 5 2012, 08:17 PM

custom made
******
Senior Member
1,362 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: k.terengganu.. alone.. with my bass...play.. alone



QUOTE(+3kk! @ May 5 2012, 08:11 PM)
which country is not?

however to say that singapore is a FDI nation is not accurate these days, they have moved on to international trade and finance, Oil refining and shipping
*
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 5 2012, 08:13 PM)
Same like any country.

However, look at SIA, Creative, Capitaland, Singtel...all regional players  hmm.gif
*
i mean, we have oil, land for growing crop.... so what makes them so far ahead? management? foreign policy?
hazremi
post May 5 2012, 08:18 PM

1million people saved this avatar bcoz she's too cute!
*******
Senior Member
5,676 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



nice info TS..i read from start until the end.

the turning point for singapore was when they opened up total investment to foreigners
empyreal
post May 5 2012, 08:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
2,036 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: KL


QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 5 2012, 08:14 PM)
That does not explain why gap between Malaysia and South Korea became much pronounced in 1980's.
*
basing on the established theory that cities are connectors i.e. they connect resources to the world market and people with other peole, some theorised that malaysia and singapore retard each other's growth. malaya basically had one port, singapore. even after 65, malaysian companies continue to utilise the sg port instead of say, port klang.

if there was no singapore (like it suddenly disappears), trade would flow through the johor, penang and klang ports, encouraging growth in these areas. likewise, if malaysia had no ports, singapore wouldve been a larger city.

also, since malaysia had more natural resources, more people need to be relatively low-skilled - if you have a mine, you will need miners. if you have no mines, you can allocate more people to higher value jobs (through incentivisation, etc. you dont need to tell people to what work they need to do - if there's a mining job, someone will take it. if there's none, there's a natural incentive for people to work harder and become more kiasu, for example).
raul88
post May 5 2012, 08:22 PM

░░Madridista ░░
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: マレーシア


nicely done

thanks for good reading info

8 Pages  1 2 3 > » 
Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0245sec    0.51    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 08:48 PM