Lowyat.NET -> INTEL OVERCLOCKING THREAD

Lowyat.NET Lowyat.NET Rules and Regulations

FAQ Help Search Members Calendar

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

INTEL OVERCLOCKING THREAD, TIPS,Q n A, Results...Great For NueBis

Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic

seanlimys

Nov 1 2008, 08:48 AM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #3821

PCXtreme_S3@nL|mY$

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,469
Joined: January 2003
From: Taiping

haha..if stable sure willing..hahha

dro

Nov 2 2008, 08:18 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #3822

Regular

Group: Junior Member
Posts: 272
Joined: June 2006
From: KL Sentral - Ipoh

GKX oso 2.3V maa?
same as my GMH

but urs at lower frequency WAY lower vdimm

seanlimys

Nov 6 2008, 08:40 AM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #3823

PCXtreme_S3@nL|mY$

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,469
Joined: January 2003
From: Taiping

gkx is vdimm lover unlike gmh

OC4/3

Nov 6 2008, 11:29 AM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #3824

Wert??

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,699
Joined: December 2007
From: Heaven of OCer

QUOTE(dro @ Nov 2 2008, 08:18 PM)

GKX oso 2.3V maa?
same as my GMH

but urs at lower frequency WAY lower vdimm

CL4-4-4-4 and full stability,test it yourself

That is not the max,just never tested as i run 1:1 only

The point is:Memtest passable

cipsmor

Nov 6 2008, 04:47 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #3825

Newbie

Group: Junior Member
Posts: 11
Joined: October 2008

i just want to start learn about OC..
someone cane help me?

my old rig

intel P4 3.0HT (N0) 800FSB (s775) eith CM Mars cooler
MSI 915P neo-2 platinum
1 x 2GB kvr 667
hd 2600xt

tkh_1001

Nov 6 2008, 07:08 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #3826

yes, she is

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,778
Joined: October 2007
From: klang

QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Nov 6 2008, 11:29 AM)

CL4-4-4-4 and full stability,test it yourself

That is not the max,just never tested as i run 1:1 only

The point is:Memtest passable

100% ram usage

n passes over 500%

OC4/3

Nov 6 2008, 07:27 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #3827

Wert??

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,699
Joined: December 2007
From: Heaven of OCer

QUOTE(tkh_1001 @ Nov 6 2008, 07:08 PM)

100% ram usage

n passes over 500%

No lah

3dmark01 lobby and memtest 100% 500MB passable,lazy to test as i test during benching one mah

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

LYR

Nov 8 2008, 05:34 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #3828

Freak

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,125
Joined: April 2006

is there anything i can do to push my clock speed higher? i only dare to adjust the bus speed and vCore a bit. no idea with others.

Attached thumbnail(s)

kmarc

Nov 8 2008, 06:17 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #3829

Technology is too slow!
Group Icon

Group: Elite
Posts: 3,636
Joined: May 2006
From: Kuching

QUOTE(LYR @ Nov 8 2008, 05:34 PM)

is there anything i can do to push my clock speed higher? i only dare to adjust the bus speed and vCore a bit. no idea with others.

Isn't your stock CPU vcore 1.3375v? Why is it set manually to 1.250v?

And you usually don't have to set the vFSB to +0.1v... just put it at default...

This post has been edited by kmarc: Nov 8 2008, 06:18 PM

LYR

Nov 8 2008, 09:09 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #3830

Freak

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,125
Joined: April 2006

QUOTE(kmarc @ Nov 8 2008, 06:17 PM)

Isn't your stock CPU vcore 1.3375v? Why is it set manually to 1.250v?

And you usually don't have to set the vFSB to +0.1v... just put it at default...

when i set the voltage control to manual, the vcore is at 1.232 first. so, i thought it's the default CPU vcore. however, even if i set the the vcore to 1.35, i will get bluescreen at windows startup with error message of ' memory blah blah blah '(the screen flashed very fast), couldnt see properly.

kmarc

Nov 8 2008, 09:17 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #3831

Technology is too slow!
Group Icon

Group: Elite
Posts: 3,636
Joined: May 2006
From: Kuching

QUOTE(LYR @ Nov 8 2008, 09:09 PM)

when i set the voltage control to manual, the vcore is at 1.232 first. so, i thought it's the default CPU vcore. however, even if i set the the vcore to 1.35, i will get bluescreen at windows startup with error message of ' memory blah blah blah '(the screen flashed very fast), couldnt see properly.

Try setting the ram multiplier to it's lowest value (should be 2.0). That way, you are sure it is not the rams (looks like your rams is running at 2.4x ram multiplier?) when you overclock.

LYR

Nov 8 2008, 09:28 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #3832

Freak

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,125
Joined: April 2006

QUOTE(kmarc @ Nov 8 2008, 09:17 PM)

Try setting the ram multiplier to it's lowest value (should be 2.0). That way, you are sure it is not the rams (looks like your rams is running at 2.4x ram multiplier?) when you overclock.

this is my ram screenshot after i overclocked it to 2.3GHz.

Attached thumbnail(s)

kmarc

Nov 8 2008, 10:37 PM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #3833

Technology is too slow!
Group Icon

Group: Elite
Posts: 3,636
Joined: May 2006
From: Kuching

QUOTE(LYR @ Nov 8 2008, 09:28 PM)

this is my ram screenshot after i overclocked it to 2.3GHz.

That could be the reason, that your rams are overclocked too much (unless you increase the vdimm).

Try reducing the ram multiplier to it's lowest value... should be 2.0. That way, you either underclock, or mildly overclock the rams..... (it's the "System Memory Multiplier" setting.....)

Note : From your previous screen shot, you were running your rams with a 3.0 ram multiplier (275mhz x 3 = 825mhz)

This post has been edited by kmarc: Nov 8 2008, 10:39 PM

LYR

Nov 9 2008, 12:09 AM

Show posts by this member only |Rating BETA (0+, 0-) | Post #3834

Freak

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,125
Joined: April 2006

QUOTE(kmarc @ Nov 8 2008, 10:37 PM)

That could be the reason, that your rams are overclocked too much (unless you increase the vdimm).

Try reducing the ram multiplier to it's lowest value... should be 2.0. That way, you either underclock, or mildly overclock the rams..... (it's the "System Memory Multiplier" setting.....)

Note : From your previous screen shot, you were running your rams with a 3.0 ram multiplier (275mhz x 3 = 825mhz)

you're right. i managed to get the processor stabled at higher clock speed after i reduced the System Memory Multiplier. thanks for your help.