Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Intel X68 platfrom, Share your infos please
TSRiddhy
|
Jun 5 2010, 01:46 AM, updated 14y ago
|
|
Intel plan a New socket to replace LGA1366 in the Q3 2011 and may be a new X68 chipset as described in the bit-tech.net web site: "Our sources in Taiwan also told us that the new chipset that will accompany this socket - inevitably being called "X68", although this is far from being an official name - will feature four DDR3 DIMM channels. It will only support one DIMM per channel as this maximises memory bandwidth, but memory density will be overall lower than current LGA1366, Core i7 systems as there will only be four sockets versus the six you see on current X58 boards. The chipset will include more PCI-E lanes of some description, either 2.0 or 3.0. " http://www.guruht.com/2010/04/new-intel-so...68-chipset.htmlPlease give more updated infos is it Q3 2011 or Q2 is it for the hexa core only becuase intel will release a i7 970 for x58 this year usd 562 so its safe to assume next year there wont be any quads for usd 562 or usd 1000 as X platforms is for the enthusiast and xtremists i think x68 will be for the 6 cores only there might be a usd 278 6 core from intel when x68 releases who knows share all your updated infos
|
|
|
|
jinaun
|
Jun 5 2010, 10:04 AM
|
where are my stars???
|
i'm wondering will x68 be a single chip platform or dual chip as like x58?
unless intel move the pcie controller into the proc... i would not see this happen
This post has been edited by jinaun: Jun 5 2010, 04:56 PM
|
|
|
|
Rosaki
|
Jun 12 2010, 05:40 PM
|
Getting Started
|
When x68 chipset release?
|
|
|
|
metsatsu
|
Jun 12 2010, 07:57 PM
|
Chocolate Starfish
|
u guys can check out LGA2011 in google
|
|
|
|
yinchet
|
Jun 12 2010, 09:22 PM
|
If you wish for peace, prepare for war
|
well some say q3 or q4 2011
|
|
|
|
Hornet
|
Jun 12 2010, 10:40 PM
|
|
Officially its Q3 for now, but thats 1 year away, and usually things will get delay and plans change.
Right now Intel isn't facing any competition in terms of performance for their x58 platform, so there's little reason for Intel to rush things
|
|
|
|
TSRiddhy
|
Jun 13 2010, 03:46 PM
|
|
i think it will only be for 6 cores at usd 562and usd 1000 and mobo price initially will be usd 300
6 core for extremist 4 cores for performance others are value and mainstream
|
|
|
|
clawhammer
|
Jun 15 2010, 03:53 PM
|
///M
|
Six DIMMS and now four DIMMS. Is Intel trying to make a fool out of us?
|
|
|
|
owikh84
|
Jun 15 2010, 09:01 PM
|
i7 Clan
|
QUOTE(clawhammer @ Jun 15 2010, 03:53 PM) Six DIMMS and now four DIMMS. Is Intel trying to make a fool out of us? cut cost it will become more affordable rig as compared to x58
|
|
|
|
yinchet
|
Jun 15 2010, 09:07 PM
|
If you wish for peace, prepare for war
|
ya... to increase their market target range as to compare wit x58... not oni it cut production cost but also increase customer base smart move either way...
well any1 have the latest intel proc road map (revise version 2010)??
|
|
|
|
AceCombat
|
Jun 16 2010, 02:02 PM
|
|
I'm far too outdated
|
|
|
|
limhongwoon
|
Jun 17 2010, 08:33 PM
|
|
QUOTE(warlordz @ Jun 17 2010, 10:00 AM) waloo.. pcie 3.0....mybe ddr4..incuding Then price of DDR3 will drop
|
|
|
|
stasio
|
Jun 22 2010, 02:44 AM
|
|
QUOTE(metsatsu @ Jun 12 2010, 07:57 PM) u guys can check out LGA2011 in google Btw, QUOTE Intel's next-generation Westmere-EX processors may come equipped with ten physical cores if a paper due to be presented later this year proves accurate.
According to iTWorld Intel's paper, due to be presented at the Hot Chips conference in August, is entitled "Westmere-EX: A 20 Thread Server CPU," and while the contents of the paper are as-yet unknown, Intel's Hyper-Threading technology usually results in twice the number of logical cores as physical cores - meaning Westmere-EX looks set to feature ten cores.
Although neither confirmed nor denied by Intel, it seems likely that the company will be planning to increase the number of cores available in its server processors in order to compete with rival AMD - and with AMD already releasing a product featuring twelve physical cores and support for up to four such processors in a single, 48-core server, Intel clearly has some catching up to do when it comes to core count per socket. http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2010...ture-10-cores/1So 20 threads - 10 physical cores This post has been edited by stasio: Jun 22 2010, 03:05 AM
|
|
|
|