Lowyat.NET Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

LYN wins Intel-Lenovo-Tangs Blogathon challenge. Thank you everybody!
80 Pages « < 78 79 80 
 RSS feedBump TopicClosed TopicStart new topicStart Poll

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> AMD 64/SEMPRON ---- OC DATABASE, Ocing results..OC problem?ask here..

Share on | Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic
PCcrazy
post Jan 15 2006, 12:50 AM
Show posts by this member only |This post's rating (0+, 0-) | Post #1581


Milanista
*******

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 3,224
Ratings earned: 0+, 0-
Ratings given: 0+, 0-

Joined: Jan 2003
From: B.B.Bangi
QUOTE(jarofclay @ Jan 14 2006, 04:05 PM)
Just to share... this is much a 3000+ Venice performing slightly better than my 3500+ Winchester.

Just bought it 2 hours ago...
305HTT
SP2004 stable for 17 mins and running...
9 x 305 = 2745Mhz
RAM = UCCC 2GB @ 249MHz @ 2T @ 3-4-4-8 (I'm not proud of this RAM sad.gif )

What do you guys think? Should I get some TCCD to play with? wink.gif
*



Yes, obviously you need a TCCD with 3000+. Multiplier 9, I just hate it the most. It's no go with BH5. I mean, typical BH5 will do 250 2-2-2-5. But 250 x 9 is only 2.25 GHz. A64 series as far as memory is concerned greatly benefited from proc clock speed.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gsan
post Jan 15 2006, 12:56 AM
Show posts by this member only |This post's rating (0+, 0-) | Post #1582


Regular
******

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,792
Ratings earned: 0+, 0-
Ratings given: 0+, 0-

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(PCcrazy @ Jan 15 2006, 12:50 AM)
Yes, obviously you need a TCCD with 3000+. Multiplier 9, I just hate it the most. It's no go with BH5. I mean, typical BH5 will do 250 2-2-2-5. But 250 x 9 is only 2.25 GHz. A64 series as far as memory is concerned greatly benefited from proc clock speed.
*



why cannot 300x9 with divider 5/6 ? and we will get 250 too.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ah_khoo
post Jan 15 2006, 03:52 AM
Show posts by this member only |This post's rating (0+, 0-) | Post #1583


^Sumthg In Life Never Chg^ *Coz' I Never Forget*
*******

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 5,761
Ratings earned: 0+, 0-
Ratings given: 0+, 0-

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.
Generally, 9x multi limits d alternatives of ram, while 10x or above multi give betta options... smile.gif

Personally, 10x is d one i luv most... biggrin.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
newbieockids
post Jan 15 2006, 05:19 PM
Show posts by this member only |This post's rating (0+, 0-) | Post #1584


Regular
******

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,324
Ratings earned: 0+, 0-
Ratings given: 0+, 0-

Joined: Jun 2005
From: putrajaya
QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Jan 15 2006, 03:52 AM)
Generally, 9x multi limits d alternatives of ram, while 10x or above multi give betta options...  smile.gif

Personally, 10x is d one i luv most...  biggrin.gif

geez ya.. 9x sure need ram that capabale in higher speed.. to keep maintain in 1:1 divider.. most of the ram if higher mhz == loose timing.. not "kaww" ler.. biggrin.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
songhan89
post Jan 20 2006, 01:08 PM
Show posts by this member only |This post's rating (0+, 0-) | Post #1585


-Hankerchizf-
******

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,102
Ratings earned: 0+, 0-
Ratings given: 0+, 0-

Joined: Sep 2004
From: NUS,Singapore
guyz... just tested out my x2 3800+ can do 2.5ghz at stock volt... this is considered normal for a decent OC?

Help me to check whether the temp is ok or not, It shows around 50C load in Asus monitor.
If i pump the volt to 1.4, can hit 2.6ghz easily.

AFAIK, asus temperature monitor need to + 5 C . So it would be 55C load for 2.5ghz sweat.gif . Should i lower the clock a bit ? or its alrgiht for this temp.

Anyway,i m running a 166mhz 5:6 divider. Ram is at 208mhz now.

Since i m using a Value Select ram, is it possible for my ram to hit around 240mhz? I hav the feeling of wanna do 9X multiplier .Besides, I m having problem of burning MemTest into bootable CD. doh.gif

This post has been edited by songhan89: Jan 20 2006, 02:39 PM
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
songhan89
post Jan 20 2006, 03:09 PM
Show posts by this member only |This post's rating (0+, 0-) | Post #1586


-Hankerchizf-
******

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,102
Ratings earned: 0+, 0-
Ratings given: 0+, 0-

Joined: Sep 2004
From: NUS,Singapore
user posted image

A short run of Prime

This post has been edited by songhan89: Jan 20 2006, 03:09 PM
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
soulfly
post Jan 20 2006, 04:22 PM
Show posts by this member only |This post's rating (0+, 0-) | Post #1587


Flash Man
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 15,090
Ratings earned: 0+, 0-
Ratings given: 0+, 0-

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Northern Soviet Sarawak
QUOTE
It is already 2006, so AMD64/Sempron OC Database clean-up will be done tonight, expect some new database posting requirements later on.


QUOTE
Benchable and Bootable results will be eliminated from the database ranking, however discussion is still possible. New ranking somehow will be based on prime stable results only.


QUOTE
Ranking will still be based on the highest clockspeed.


QUOTE
Database will be divided into 3 categories which are socket-939 (Athlon64, Athlon64 FX, Opteron), socket-939 X2 (dual cores) and socket-754 (Athlon64, Sempron, Turion & mobile Athlon64/Sempron).


QUOTE
Ranking format will be overclocked speed - user - cpu type - cpu stepping - cpu voltage - cooling method (air/water/etc)

Example:

1. 2911MHz | HornyGuy | Athlon64 X2 3800+ | CDBHE 0527UPAW | 1.60V | WATER
2. 2800MHz | I-luv-frogs | Athlon64 X2 3800+ | CDBHE 0528EPAW | 1.52V | AIR
3. ....
4. ....

Ranking list will be linked to result posting. Please provide necessary informations in your posting for reference and discussion use.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
winc87
post Jan 20 2006, 04:30 PM
Show posts by this member only |This post's rating (0+, 0-) | Post #1588


w|Nc
******

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 1,464
Ratings earned: 0+, 0-
Ratings given: 0+, 0-

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Seremban
hehe very short run indeed. You might need to run at least 2 loops in order to prove that it is stable at that speed with the voltage given.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
« Next Oldest · Lowyat.NET Overclocking Database · Next Newest »
 

80 Pages « < 78 79 80
 Bump TopicClosed TopicTopic OptionsStart new topic
 



----debug section please ignore----
Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd November 2009 - 10:40 PM
All Rights Reserved 2003-2009 Vijandren Ramadass (~living on a prayer~)
Powered by Invision Power Board(Trial) © 2009  IPS, Inc.