Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
HD4850 or HD5670 or HD5770, Need help comparing performances
|
TSEugene91
|
Feb 14 2010, 08:49 PM, updated 16y ago
|
|
Take for example if comparing HD4850 vs HD5670 vs 5770
1. How to rank them in order?
2. How far would 4850 and 5670 performance differ?
3. How far would 4850 and 5770 performance differ?
Sorry i tried googling.. Maybe im a noob at googling i cant find a good comparison.. hmm..
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKal-el
|
Feb 14 2010, 08:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSEugene91
|
Feb 14 2010, 10:16 PM
|
|
Great! Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
headhunter7
|
Feb 14 2010, 10:23 PM
|
|
The 5970 is truly a monster. @_@
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKal-el
|
Feb 14 2010, 11:04 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Eugene91 @ Feb 14 2010, 10:16 PM) its best if you see whats best for your resolution. you can check it Here
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSEugene91
|
Feb 14 2010, 11:26 PM
|
|
Because i might be able to get an Asus EAH4850 @ Rm250 from a friend.. HD5670 is about RM310- 512mb 399-1GB HD5670 Vapor-X RM620 so based on performance 4850 would be cheaper  compared to 5670
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKal-el
|
Feb 14 2010, 11:27 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Eugene91 @ Feb 14 2010, 11:26 PM) Because i might be able to get an Asus EAH4850 @ Rm250 from a friend.. HD5670 is about RM310- 512mb 399-1GB HD5670 Vapor-X RM620 so based on performance 4850 would be cheaper  compared to 5670 if RM250 just grab it, too good to let go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSEugene91
|
Feb 15 2010, 10:33 AM
|
|
I hope he's letting it go at that price then..  Added on February 15, 2010, 10:37 amBtw im wondering what will i lose if comparing 4850 and 5670 ? DX11 only? This post has been edited by Eugene91: Feb 15 2010, 10:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
boonwuilow
|
Feb 15 2010, 11:14 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Eugene91 @ Feb 15 2010, 10:33 AM) I hope he's letting it go at that price then..  Added on February 15, 2010, 10:37 amBtw im wondering what will i lose if comparing 4850 and 5670 ? DX11 only? What u will lose is DX11, Direct Compute 5.0, lesser stream processor in 4850.
|
|
|
|
|
|
budakhops
|
Feb 15 2010, 01:39 PM
|
|
i can say 5770 ~ 4850 > 5670...
just 5000 series card got DX11 and new tech... if u play DX11 games, for sure 5000 series more performed then 4000 series card... and another thing, 5000 series less consume power...
|
|
|
|
|
|
secondrate
|
Feb 15 2010, 02:49 PM
|
|
QUOTE(budakhops @ Feb 15 2010, 01:39 PM) i can say 5770 ~ 4850 > 5670...just 5000 series card got DX11 and new tech... if u play DX11 games, for sure 5000 series more performed then 4000 series card... and another thing, 5000 series less consume power... This. But I doubt using a HD5670 to play DX11 games will produce playable fps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
budakhops
|
Feb 15 2010, 04:29 PM
|
|
QUOTE(secondrate @ Feb 15 2010, 02:49 PM) This. But I doubt using a HD5670 to play DX11 games will produce playable fps. well, depend on your resolution too... i think 30fps ++ is playable fps... maybe quite sakit mata a bit la... got some lagg..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erickk
|
Feb 15 2010, 09:34 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Get either 4850 or 5770. currently applications and games are using direct x 10 or 9 . You can temporary buy 4850 wait use for one year as the price is almost 1/2 5770. Might as well wait for better cards(future) or lower price of gpu cards( when new batch release).
This post has been edited by Erickk: Feb 15 2010, 09:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
naminakata87
|
Feb 16 2010, 06:53 AM
|
|
look for your budget though,if posible,get 5770&try game on window 7..but make sure u have good ram also,u can see a lot dif betwen xp&vista
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSEugene91
|
Feb 16 2010, 07:08 PM
|
|
Im greedy.. Willing to spend RM300 only for decent card LoL.. not hardcore gamer.. look at my desktop in my siggy
|
|
|
|
|
|
mat_tz
|
Feb 16 2010, 07:21 PM
|
|
QUOTE(boonwuilow @ Feb 15 2010, 11:14 AM) What u will lose is DX11, Direct Compute 5.0, lesser stream processor in 4850. i dont know why my eyes cannot see any different between dx9 and dx10.. big different between dx9,dx10 and dx11?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Azureknight94
|
Feb 16 2010, 07:32 PM
|
|
Just get the 4850 for 250 thats just too good an offer to pass up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DarkSilver
|
Feb 16 2010, 07:47 PM
|
Idiosyncrasy
|
QUOTE(budakhops @ Feb 15 2010, 04:29 PM) well, depend on your resolution too... i think 30fps ++ is playable fps... maybe quite sakit mata a bit la... got some lagg.. Correct. DirectX 11(refers to Ultra-Settings) Games are too heavy. Above 25FPS++ should be fine. Above 30FPS will be very good already. I mean at every scene and any places. If some places are laggy, then, not nice already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
S16
|
Feb 16 2010, 07:56 PM
|
Getting Started

|
ATi 5770 bro...
|
|
|
|
|