don't tell me it's another one of those stupid NV naming conventions.
i mean look at it
QUOTE
One card that should be even less expensive then the aforementioned products is NVIDIA's upcoming 9800 GT. The 9800 GT is basically a die-shrunk 8800 GT. The 8800 GT has a 65nm GPU where the 9800 GT has a 55nm part. Apparently this video card has been peaking through the hedges for a while, turning up here and there, and should be coming not too long from now, although no official announcement has been made.
look, if it was a DIE-SHRUNK 8800GT, then please call it 8800GT-ds or something - NOT the 9800GT
look at 7600GT vs 8600GT - you see the 8600GT has performance boost.
8600GT vs 9600GT - performance boost too!
but to call 8800GT and 9800GT but to run it at the same speed would be damn ridiculous.
just because it's on a shrunken die that doesn't merit a GENERATION boost IMO.
QUOTE
The 9800 GT apparently is reportedly set to the same clocks as the 8800 GT ( 600/1500/1800 MHz, [core/shader/memory])

the 9800GTX itself was a joke IMO. one generation higher than 8800GTS and even have a GTX name but performance is almost same. it's like WTH!??!?! so little performance boost despite being a generation and a step higher?