QUOTE(gpa4ite2008 @ Dec 26 2008, 05:05 PM)
Lowerping is useless for malaysia now.... rather use P1MAX
40% of the world say lowerping is a scam...
40% of statistics are made up.
QUOTE
and also even you got a new ip ... tmnet will block lowerping even you ask them not to.. so its useless.
Is there a basis for this?
QUOTE
My friend paid 109USD
Your friend either got scammed, is a moron, or is lying.
QUOTE
Added on December 26, 2008, 5:14 pmwhat did judgetread stated was true.. no point getting these services because few parts of this service already inside the patch of WoW unless you play a private server thats your own business. Blizzard already stated that the " registry hack " is already in their patch in 2.4 and also they use other service other than lowerping .
The only thing Patch 2.3 did was to disable the Nagle algorithm, or the TCP_NODELAY socket variable. It did nothing to alleviate the TCP_ACKFREQ issue which is the more significant part of why WoW's connection protocols give such a horrendous latency compared to straight out pinging the servers.
It is obvious you either have no idea what you're talking about with regards to Lowerping, or have it confused with something else. As of now, you can literally just create a Lowerping account and immediately use it on a trial basis (it disconnects you periodically on trial accounts), and costs AUS7 for a month's subscription (So yeah, I have nfi where a figure of 109USD came from)
I've been getting 200-230 around the clock*, rarely if ever going above 300ms during peak hours. I have absolutely no idea what you're doing wrong to get different results. This is to Frostmourne, where without LP at the moment good connectivity is more or less nonexistant with 10k+ latencies on the same TMNET IP ranges (10k+ has nothing to do with normal connectivity, but I'm just throwing it out there as a comparison as to the reliability of the proxy service)
What you get is a service that thousands of other people who also play the game are using - if anything happens to the connections, all these people are going to be complaining at the same time, and it is in LP's best interest to get it fixed ASAP; this means much more reliable routing than just taking whatever your ISP hands you. Case in point: The current problem across Christmas period.
What the risks actually are, is the fact that you're passing your data through someone else's box, and the fact that if you're stupid about IP-hopping across continents multiple times in a short period, it's bound to raise some flags.
*
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/5752/wo...08060347vd2.jpg Not exaggerating, here's a screenie with 218ms; I can take more during peak hours if you want. Quartz castbar shown mid-cast just for you junkies who know what the red portion signifies.
Added on December 27, 2008, 5:22 amWanted to add. This was w.r.t Lowerping itself, as in the original, Australian based proxy service. It's not to be confused with local counterparts (which many people just dub 'lowerping' anyway, much like how all toothpaste is Colgate), which may or may not be better/worse - as I do not use them, I cannot comment. But what I'm trying to say is, the difference is there, and it's real.
Internet connectivity isn't all just about a couple of TCP variables, or what IP you get when connecting to streamyx. It's a shit ton more complex than that, and if you think it's worth AUS7 a month (or whatever fee the local counterparts charge) to let someone else deal with all the technical bullshit while you just play the game, then by all means subscribe. Or just test out the free trials.